Wednesday, January 17th, 2001
In This Issue


My Weather
National Forecast
National Summary
National Radar
Canadian
International

The HiLite
520 E. Main St.
Carmel, IN 46032-2299
(317) 846-7721, Ext. 1143

© 2000 The HiLite, HiLite Online,
Carmel Clay School Corporation
All Rights Reserved.
 
 
 
  In This Section
School uniforms would limit self-expression
School uniforms would limit self-expression

 

As more and more public schools begin changing their dress code, many often require that students dress in uniforms. This often controversial topic has been debated, and now the subject will encounter some children in the Carmel Clay School district.



The way students choose to dress is one of the most important ways of expressing their personalities. Others can make certain assumptions based on what people wear, including what their music tastes are or what their ideas on politics are.

For this reason, many courts have kept with the constitutional right to privacy, which is implied by First Amendment. This guarantees the freedom of expression and protects our right to express ourselves through clothing and hairstyles.

Questions to ask
According to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), some public schools are considering adopting a required school wardrobe to promote school discipline and spirit. Some states, such as California, now have laws that permit schools to require students to wear uniforms.

However, this brings up two questions. The first is whether a rule requiring a student to purchase a uniform violates the student’s right to a free education. If a required school wardrobe is provided to students who cannot afford to buy one, that problem is solved.
The other question is whether requiring a uniform violates the right to free expression. School officials would find it hard to prove that the failure of a student to wear a demanded school dress would present a danger or disruption.

No court has yet ruled whether school-uniform regulations are constitutional, according to the ACLU. A California law contains a provision allowing parents to decide that their children do not have to wear required school dress. A law including this factor is more likely to be constitutional than one that does not. On the other hand, it may also undermine claims of school officials that the law is needed to prevent violence.

However, school uniforms eliminate the distractions of designer clothes. They also could create an environment in which students will be judged on personality rather than fashion sense. Indeed, many questions have been debated regarding school uniforms and dress codes, but switching to uniforms may limit one of students’ most important ways of expressing themselves.


E-mail this article to a friend - Print a printer friendly version on this page
What is your opinion on this story? Let us know with your comments.
Feedback