Health Updates
Health and Fitness Glencoe Online
Health and Fitness Home Product Information Site Map Search Contact Us

Health Updates

Biotechnology: Miracle or Monster

Earl Morgenstern's farm has been in his family for generations. Recently, the farm has grown more profitable than ever. Earl now grows corn that resists insects and the damage they cause. His crop yield is higher, which means more food to feed hungry people.

Does this sound too good to be true? It may be. Earl's new agricultural bounty is not the result of a "green thumb." Rather, it is an example of a new science at work, known as biotechnology.

The Basics of Biotech

That word, like the gorgeous ears of corn Earl Morgenstern has been producing, is a mouthful. Biotechnology—or "biotech" for short—refers to a variety of scientific methods for genetically engineered or modified life forms such as food-bearing plants. The underlying principles of biotechnology are nothing new. Pesticides, or chemicals that kill crop-eating insects, for example, have been around for hundreds of years.

The difference with biotechnology is that it allows scientists actually to manipulate the genetic structure of living things. Scientists are, thus, able to create more desirable traits that include better appearance and taste, or higher yields due to disease resistance. Enter Farmer Earl's ears of plump, sweet, and pest-resistant corn.

Biotech or Not

Although the final tally is not in, the views on biotechnology so far are mixed. Opponents of the method include a company down the road from Earl's farm that produces organic foods. The company was forced to destroy thousands of bags of food that found to be altered by genetically modified organisms, or GMOs. The contamination was traced to Earl's farm. Pollen from his genetically modified corn had been carried by the wind onto the company grounds.

Other opponents argue that foods produced through biotech methods are themselves a potential health hazard. The U.S. government is listening carefully to the debate. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has for the time asked manufacturers to voluntarily label any foods that are made with genetically engineered ingredients.

The Center for Consumer Research, a non-profit private group, would like to take precautions a step further. They want stricter, thorough testing of GE foods. They would also like to see the labels "GMO-free" or "Biotech-free" on products, with supporting documentation to back up the claim.

The Pro's

Despite all these concerns, the new technology does have its benefits. Supporters are quick to point these out.

  • Improved nutritional value. Foods such as tomatoes can be engineered to have increased nutritional value to reduce cancer risks.
  • A weapon against malnutrition. Biotech can help solve the problem of malnutrition by creating nutrient-rich foods. For instance, through genetic manipulation, researchers have created a rice rich in beta-carotene. This will be donated to poor countries suffering from vitamin deficiencies.
  • Increases in crop yields. Larger crops can help in the fight against worldwide hunger.
  • A plus for the environment. Arguments have been raging for years over the dangers of pesticides. These are said to pollute the environment and endanger animal and human life. Biotechnology promises to change all that. Biotech cotton, for example, has been genetically engineered in such a way as to be poisonous to insects that feed on cotton.

The Cons

Those in the anti-biotech camp have their share of concerns.

  • Long-term effects on the environment. Opponents believe that cross-pollination of GMO crops could result in "superweeds" that are resistant to pesticides. They also express a fear of a technology whose long-term impact has yet to be seen.
  • Introduction of allergens and toxins. Allergens—substances such as pollen that can cause an allergic reaction—could be transferred from one food to another. For example, splicing a gene from a Brazil nut into soybeans can trigger a reaction in a person allergic to Brazil nuts.
  • Potential effects on human health. Unlike sprayed pesticides which can be washed off by the consumer, biotechnology permanently alters food. The toxins, if any, reside within the produce itself. This may be ingested by humans.
  • Potential impact on wildlife. Environmental groups point to laboratory studies in which pollen from biotech corn was found to be poisonous to the monarch butterfly. In addition, these groups are concerned that the very pests being targeted will develop a resistance to the biotech crops intended to stop them.

Just the Facts

  1. What is biotechnology, and how is it being used in agriculture?
  2. How has the FDA responded to the controversy over biotech?

Beyond the Facts

  1. Do you believe GMO labeling should be required? Why or why not?
  2. Compare and contrast arguments in favor of genetically engineered foods and those against these foods. State in your own words which side makes a stronger case, and why.

Applying the Facts

A number of companies, including a well-known seller of fast food and a snack maker, have taken strong positions on the use of biotech foods. The positions have been widely publicized. Working in teams, find out about these views. Use print or online resources. You may alternatively contact fast-food establishments in your community to see whether they are providing literature on this subject. Share your findings with classmates.

 


McGraw-Hill / Glencoe
The McGraw-Hill Companies